Foundry Magazine
Foundry Channels
  METALS & ALLOYS   MELTING   REFRACTORIES   SAND & BINDERS   POURING & FILTERING   COREMAKING   MOLDING   SIMULATION   AUTOMATION   PROCESS CONTROL   SHAKEOUT, CLEANING,
  & FINISHING
  HEAT TREATING   TESTING, MEASURING,
  & QUALITY CONTROL
  ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
  & SAFETY
CASE STUDIES USEFUL LINKS SUBSCRIPTIONS CONTACT US
 
Sand Binders: Six Sigma Helps Predict Sand-Binder Performance
By FMT Staff | Published February 19, 2006
Reprints  |   Printer Friendly
  |   Email a Friend

PUCBs can deliver positive, optimal performance

The influence of sand binders in metalcasting operations is often underestimated, in particular their influence on process efficiency and casting quality.

The history of phenolic-urethane cold-box (PUCB) binders over the past 30+ years has seen many compositional variations as technological advances come, and in some cases go. Successful PUCB binders deliver optimal performance with the maximum number of positive attributes, without any properties that are obvious "show stoppers."

To read the complete report, subscribe to the Foundry Management & Technology free digital edition

Reprints  |   Printer Friendly   |   Email a Friend
Metal Producing Review
Rating :
Your Email Address (optional) :
Comments (optional - 100 characters maximum) :
Note: the email address
is for internal use only.
It is not posted or shared.
Foundry Share Through Social Bookmarking